Agentic AI Patterns: The Autonomous Workforce

The Reader's Dilemma
Dear Marilyn,Everyone is talking about "AI Agents" now. I understand chatbots and simple automation, but what makes an agent different? And how do I design systems that can actually leverage these autonomous AI workers without creating chaos?
Marilyn's Reply
The difference between a chatbot and an agent is like the difference between a calculator and a mathematician. A calculator performs operations you specify. A mathematician understands the problem, plans an approach, executes steps, and adjusts based on results.
Agentic AI represents a paradigm shift from reactive to proactive systems. Let's explore the patterns that make this possible.
The Spark: Understanding Agentic AI
What Makes an Agent "Agentic"?
An AI agent possesses four fundamental capabilities that distinguish it from traditional automation:
| Capability | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Perception | Ability to observe and interpret the environment | Reading emails, parsing documents, monitoring systems |
| Reasoning | Ability to analyze information and make decisions | Determining priority, identifying patterns, planning steps |
| Action | Ability to execute tasks and interact with systems | Calling APIs, writing code, sending messages |
| Learning | Ability to improve from experience and feedback | Refining approaches, remembering preferences, adapting strategies |
Quick Check
What distinguishes an AI agent from a simple chatbot?
The ReAct Pattern: Reasoning + Acting
The ReAct (Reasoning and Acting) pattern is the foundation of most agentic systems. It interleaves thinking with doing:
# ReAct Loop Pseudocode
while task_not_complete:
# THOUGHT: Reason about the current state
thought = llm.think(f"""
Task: {task}
Observations: {observations}
What should I do next and why?
""")
# ACTION: Choose and execute an action
action = llm.decide_action(thought, available_tools)
result = execute_action(action)
# OBSERVE: Update understanding based on result
observations.append(result)
# REFLECT: Determine if task is complete
if is_task_complete(observations):
breakThis pattern prevents the agent from blindly executing a predetermined plan. Instead, it continuously adapts based on what it observes.
Quick Check
In the ReAct pattern, what happens after an agent executes an action?
Tool Use: Extending Agent Capabilities
Agents become truly powerful when they can use tools. Tools are functions or APIs that extend what an agent can do:
Information Tools
- Web search
- Database queries
- API calls
- File reading
Action Tools
- Code execution
- Email sending
- File writing
- System commands
# Tool Definition Example
tools = [
{
"name": "search_web",
"description": "Search the web for information",
"parameters": {
"query": "string - the search query"
}
},
{
"name": "execute_sql",
"description": "Execute a SQL query on the database",
"parameters": {
"query": "string - the SQL query to execute"
}
},
{
"name": "send_email",
"description": "Send an email to a recipient",
"parameters": {
"to": "string - recipient email",
"subject": "string - email subject",
"body": "string - email body"
}
}
]Quick Check
Why are tools essential for agentic AI systems?
Multi-Agent Orchestration
Complex tasks often require multiple specialized agents working together. This is where orchestration patterns become crucial:
Supervisor Pattern
A "manager" agent delegates tasks to specialized worker agents and coordinates their outputs. Best for hierarchical workflows with clear task decomposition.
Swarm Pattern
Agents communicate peer-to-peer without central coordination. Best for emergent behavior and parallel exploration of solution spaces.
Pipeline Pattern
Each agent processes output from the previous agent in a chain. Best for sequential workflows where each step transforms the data.
Quick Check
Which orchestration pattern would be best for a code review system where code is analyzed, then tested, then documented?
Safety and Guardrails
Autonomous agents require careful safety considerations. Key guardrail patterns include:
- Human-in-the-Loop: Require human approval for high-stakes actions
- Sandboxing: Limit what tools and resources an agent can access
- Rate Limiting: Prevent runaway loops or excessive resource consumption
- Audit Logging: Record all agent decisions and actions for review
- Kill Switches: Ability to immediately halt agent execution
Quick Check
What is the purpose of 'Human-in-the-Loop' in agentic AI systems?